Teacher Background Information

This elaboration provides an opportunity for students to examine how scientific knowledge is refined. Students can review recent studies that detail the data and findings about various traditional fire-management regimes and practices of First Nations Australians. Students can develop an appreciation of how this research is used to inform and shape Australian bushfire policies, and has reduced the occurrence of catastrophic fire events.

Prior to the arrival of European colonisers, First Australians had for millennia conducted controlled and purposeful burning of the landscape, a practice that can be described as a planned and precise local caring of country.

Burning occurred over most of Australia every 1-5 years. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities carefully determined the timing, frequency and location of the burns depending on local flora and local abiotic features, as well as purpose. Cool fires were burnt in spring or in the early dry season to minimise the build-up of fuel load, thus preventing the occurrence of uncontrollable and much more damaging wildfires later. These cool fires also ensured effective cycling of soil nutrients which encouraged the growth of staple foods, such as yams and cycads. The subsequent regeneration of plants could also encourage the migration of target game species by providing the feed and shelter they preferred. Hotter fires were lit in early summer to open hard seeds and pods or germinate legumes. 

The development of such strategic burning regimes was based on sophisticated knowledge in multiple scientific fields such as: meteorological knowledge for timing season and moisture conditions; botanical knowledge to understand how certain plant species respond to or even depend on fire and how tolerant they are of fire intensity; and zoological knowledge to choose the correct timing to encourage game species to the area.

The typical European perspective of fire was that it was dangerous and destructive. Until the middle of the 20th century, fire management practices in Australia were generally aimed at prevention of any fires occurring and suppression of fires wherever possible. According to the legislations of most States and Territories at the time, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities faced imprisonment and fines for burning landscapes according to their traditions. 

Therefore, with the incursion into Australia of Europeans, many with little or no experience of bushfires, traditional land management practices were disrupted, the result being sudden and extensive ecological change. The extent of these changes is evident by comparing the descriptions of landscapes seen by naturalists such as Leichhardt with the landscapes as they currently exist. For example, in many places where there were park-like grasslands, there are now dense undergrowth and forest with their associated increased fuel loads and altered landscapes. 

When scientific research of bushfires began in Australia in the 1930s it was heavily influenced by, and modelled on, North-American and European research with its prime focus on bushfire protection and suppression. The beneficial effects of bushfires on Australian ecosystems and biodiversity were not yet understood by Western science. Following a series of catastrophic bushfires in the 1950s and 1960s, researchers became increasingly aware of the necessity of fuel load reduction to prevent the occurrence of massive out-of-control wildfires. Western researchers increasingly looked towards indigenous solutions to fire management and, although heavily debated at the time, controlled burnings were eventually introduced to mitigate the risk of large-scale fires. Bushfire scientists also started to investigate the long-term effects of traditional Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander fire regimes on forest health and on the distribution of plant and animal communities.

It is now understood that anthropogenic fire has been an integral part of Australia’s ecosystem for thousands of years and has favourably shaped the distribution and diversity of flora and fauna on the Australian continent. It is widely accepted among ecologists today that the disruption of traditional burning practices has led to substantial declines in biodiversity in many areas, particularly in the tropical savanna regions of northern Australia. Numerous studies have shown that by utilising traditional ecological knowledge and re-adopting traditional burning practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, the risk of catastrophic fire events, as well as the total area burnt by hot wildfires, is significantly reduced. This also leads to environmentally beneficial outcomes, such as fewer greenhouse gas emissions and reduced long-term damage to ecosystems. See elaboration for AC9S9U03 for a more detailed discussion of the beneficial ecological effects of traditional fire management practices.

By exploring recent studies into various fire-management regimes, students learn how the traditional fire management practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have informed and shaped Australian bushfire policies and subsequently reduced the occurrence of catastrophic fire events. Students also have opportunities to develop their appreciation that science understanding of the natural world is dynamic and continues to be refined over time.